Showing posts with label California. Show all posts
Showing posts with label California. Show all posts

Monday, April 7, 2025

Bernie Sanders, AOC, Coming to Folsom, California Tues. April 15




 Bernie’s coming to Folsom  on Tuesday, April 15, and you’re invited! He’ll be speaking alongside Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez about how our movement can come together to take on the Oligarchy and demand a government that works for all of us, not just the wealthy few.

This is going to be a great event, and we’d love to see you there. So, can you make it? Here’s everything you need to know:

TPlease be advised that there is a venue change: we will now be at the Folsom Lake College Athletic Track in Folsom, CA.

Here's everything you need to know:

Fighting Oligarchy: Where We Go From Here with Bernie Sanders in Folsom
With Special Guest Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Tuesday, April 15
3:30pm PDT Doors Open
6:00pm PDT Speaking Program Starts
Folsom Lake College Athletic Track

10 College Pkwy, Folsom, CA 95630 

📅

Here are some ways you can take action.

All times Pacific

 

 

Sunday, April 14, 2024

We Demand Tax Fairness


Advancing Tax Fairness

According to a recent study by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, the largest profitable corporations from 2018 through 2022 paid an average effective federal income tax rate of just 14.1% during this five-year period — almost a third less than the statutory rate of 21%. In California, Budget Center research highlights that corporations pay far less of their California income in state taxes than a generation ago. 

Meanwhile, corporate profits in California have skyrocketed, reaching $368 billion in 2021 alone — a staggering 155% increase since 2002, when adjusted for inflation. Contrastingly, the average full-time, year-round worker in California has only seen a 13% increase in earnings during the same timeframe after accounting for inflation.

Learn more about how you can advance tax fairness in California:

Tuesday, January 23, 2024

CSU Strike Settled _ Pending Vote of Members

 The strike at the largest university system in the nation has ended ( subject to ratification vote by the faculty union.

Posted 

“The collective action of so many lecturers, professors, counselors, librarians and coaches over these last eight months forced C.S.U. management to take our demands seriously,” Charles Toombs, president of the union, said in a statement.

The deal would immediately increase salaries for all faculty members by 5 percent, retroactively to July 1, 2023, with another 5 percent raise to take effect July 1, 2024, according to union officials. It would also immediately raise the salary floor for the lowest-paid faculty members by $3,000, and increase paid parental leave to 10 weeks from six.

Mildred García, the chancellor of the university system, said in a statement Monday night that she was “extremely pleased” with the deal, adding that it “enables the C.S.U. to fairly compensate its valued, world-class faculty while protecting the university system’s long-term financial sustainability.”


I participated in the creation of this union and was a local official prior to retirement.


Wednesday, August 23, 2023

California: Mixing Oil and Water

Mixing Oil and Water

How the Political Economy of Energy and Food Links Southern California and Saudi Arabia

BY BILL BARCLAY | JULY/AUGUST 2023

https://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2023/0723barclay.html



Economics as if people mattered. 


Tuesday, November 22, 2022

California To Become the World's Fourth Largest Economy

 

California is set to become the world’s 4th largest economy — larger than Germany and the United Kingdom if the state were an independent nation. This strong economy should ensure that every resident has a roof over their head, access to food and clean drinking water, the opportunity to get a higher education, and a robust safety net to fall on when things get tough.

Yet, despite California becoming the world’s 4th largest economy, too many Californians are left out of our state’s economic success. As leaders celebrate California’s strong economy, we have to remember those that are continuously shut out from accessing our state’s wealth, and we must take collective action to create an inclusive economy.

This fall about 2 in 3 California households with incomes under $35,000 had trouble affording basic needs like housing, groceries, and diapers. For Black, Latinx, and other Californians of color, the challenge is often greater. This is a result of historical and continued policies that create and exacerbate racism and discrimination across our state, creating disparities in earnings, well-being, and wealth building.

As inflation and high housing costs continue to take a toll on Californians, state leaders must ensure that our public policies create an economy that benefits every Californian, not just corporations and those at the top.

One way California can help distribute our state’s great wealth is by strengthening existing tax credits like the California Earned Income Tax Credit, commonly known as the CalEITC, which puts cash into the pockets of California workers, their families, and young working adults with low incomes.

Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Texas and California

 



In recent months, California has taken the lead in yet another way: As conservative states move to enact far-right legislative agendas, politicians in California say they’re spearheading the resistance. State lawmakers have proposed measures that would make California a kind of legal sanctuary for women seeking abortions and parents with trans children. Gov. Gavin Newsom called for gun control legislation modeled on Texas’ abortion law, which would allow private individuals to sue makers of restricted firearms.

And as my colleague Shawn Hubler and I reported in this article about why red and blue states are shifting even further apart, Newsom has also become more vocal in his criticisms of the policies implemented by his conservative counterparts.

“We are not going to sit back and neutrally watch the progress of the 20th century get erased,” he told us.

Of course, for years, leaders of states like Texas and Florida have painted the Golden State as a dystopian hellscape in efforts to appeal to their Republican bases, and to lure businesses and residents.

 NYTimes. 4/5/2022

 

Tuesday, May 18, 2021

California Record Revenue- Budget

Recovery, Recall and Record Revenue: What’s Driving Newsom’s Budget

Tuesday: Gov. Gavin Newsom’s $267.8 billion budget proposal reflects the wish list of a state “just flush with cash.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/18/us/california-gavin-newsom-budget.html?

 

Six-hundred-dollar checks. Universal prekindergarten. Forgiveness for back rent, traffic tickets, utility bills. Big investments in the electrical grid, broadband, wildfire prevention, drought mitigation. Tax breaks for small business and Hollywood.

Flush with a huge surplus and threatened by a campaign to recall him from office, Gov. Gavin Newsom last week proposed a state budget that was the government equivalent of that time everyone in the studio audience got a Pontiac on Oprah. This week, state legislators took up the $267.8 billion plan.

With a mid-June budget deadline and Newsom’s fellow Democrats dominating the Legislature, the broad priorities are unlikely to change much. Still, like all those free cars, it’s a lot to process. Here are a few things to know:

This budget is about both the recovery and the recall.

Newsom has been in campaign mode for months, since it became clear that the Republican-led recall effort would most likely lead to a special election. Polls show that an increasing majority of voters disapprove of the recall. But he’s still in a vulnerable position with lawmakers and lobbyists.

Last week’s budget rollout was a cavalcade of photo ops for big-ticket line items: Rebate checks of up to $1,100 on Monday for middle-income Californians; historic spending on homelessness on Tuesday; an expansion of preschool to all 4-year-olds on Wednesday; a major small-business grant program on Thursday.

For the teachers’ unions that helped elect him, the governor proposed a record $14,000 in per-pupil school funding. For parents furious that more than half of the state’s public school students remain learning remotely, that funding was contingent on an in-person return to classrooms.

Progressives who get out the vote for Democrats in California elections got repayment of billions of dollars in back rent and utility bills for low-income renters, funding for pilot universal-basic-income programs, and forgiveness of some $300 million worth of traffic tickets for low-income drivers. Newsom also proposed extending Medi-Cal to undocumented workers over 60 and significantly expanding 

Businesses have already received a $6.2 billion tax cut. But the governor also proposed hundreds of millions of dollars in incentives for companies to relocate to California, for tourism marketing and for tax credits to lure filming back from, he said, “places like Georgia whose values don’t always align with the production crews.”

 

NY Times.  May 18,2021


Monday, May 3, 2021

California Economy is doing quite well


 https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/28/business/california-budget-stock-market.html?






Wednesday, February 3, 2021

Vaccine Rollout in California

 

Author Headshot

By Jill Cowan

Good morning.

As virus cases and hospitalizations drop and increasing attention turns to the state’s vaccine rollout, California officials are attempting a fine balancing act between speeding up the process and ensuring that vulnerable populations aren’t shut out.

On Tuesday, Dr. Mark Ghaly, the state’s secretary of health and human services, said in a news conference that the two goals were not mutually exclusive.

“This notion that we have to make a choice between speed and equity — it’s a false choice,” he said. “We can do both.”

But in a state where officials have repeatedly said that equity was a top priority, and that transparency would be built into the effort, information about who’s getting vaccinated and in what order has been difficult to come by.

So far, more than 3.5 million doses of vaccine have been administered in California, Dr. Ghaly said. The rate of vaccinations statewide, he said, has been building day by day, since a surge in hospitalizations over the holidays. According to a New York Times tracker, about 7.4 percent of the state’s population has gotten at least one shot. That number is 8 percent for the nation overall.

However, the state has not released demographic statistics about who received the vaccines, so it’s unclear whether Latinos or other Californians of color who have been at disproportionate risk have been vaccinated at commensurate rates.

Dr. Ghaly suggested state officials were weighing several methods of incentivizing vaccine providers to specifically target vulnerable communities, including with payments for performance.

Gov. Gavin Newsom last week announced that the state would revamp its vaccine distribution approach after widespread criticism that the rollout had been confusing and piecemeal.

Part of that restructuring involved enlisting two of the state’s biggest health insurers, Blue Shield of California and Kaiser Permanente, to help with a statewide distribution system that would prioritize equity and streamline a patchwork system.

And the state created a website and data portal that officials have said will not only notify Californians when they are eligible for a vaccine and help them make appointments, but also would help collect and share data with federal agencies or others who may be working to allocate vaccines.

[Visit the site, myturn.ca.gov, to sign up for notifications.]

On Tuesday, Dr. Ghaly declined to share details of the partnerships, but said any transitions to new systems would not disrupt existing appointments.

Experts have said that enlisting bigger, more experienced health care providers could help accelerate a vaccine rollout that has been hampered by its being implemented by already overwhelmed local public health departments.

In at least one place, though, simply having a smaller, more nimble agency in charge has made a significant difference, officials there have said.

A Look at Long Beach

Mayor Robert Garcia of Long Beach told me that the fact that the city has its own health department, separate from Los Angeles County’s, had helped make its vaccine rollout a model within the state, hailed by Mr. Newsom.

“We can move fast and make decisions quickly,” Mr. Garcia said. “It’s been very beneficial.”

The city of about 467,000 people — Los Angeles County’s second largest — was the first jurisdiction to move from vaccinating health care workers and nursing home staff and residents to inoculating grocery store workers and critical public schoolteachers and staff. Anyone 65 and older has also been eligible, as directed by the state.

And it is also set to begin vaccinating crucial workers at California State University, Long Beach.

[See how the vaccine rollout is going in California and other states.]

As of Tuesday, some 48,000 doses had been administered, according to data provided by Jennifer Rice Epstein, a city spokeswoman. The city has also been inoculating nonresidents who work in Long Beach, but if the doses had all gone to residents, that would represent more than 10 percent of the population.

That includes shots for 16,000 health care workers, almost 7,000 long-term care facility residents and staff, and 2,500 grocery store workers.

Mr. Garcia said the city’s health department was able to build on significant work bringing testing to harder-hit neighborhoods, where many lower-wage, often undocumented workers live.

“We had one of the best testing operations of anywhere in the state,” he said. “A lot of our testing sites just became vaccine sites.”

Those efforts have been coupled with a robust notification system that frequently updates users, even if they are not yet eligible for a vaccine, he said.

The city data showed that about 49 percent of the people who have been vaccinated in Long Beach are white — a reflection of most of the vaccines having gone to residents 65 and older, a population that is mostly white, Ms. Epstein wrote in an email. Roughly 21 percent were Hispanic or Latino, about 20 percent Asian and 7.6 percent Black or African-American.

The city’s population is nearly 45 percent Hispanic or Latino, and roughly 28 percent white, 12 percent Asian and 11 percent Black, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau.

Still, it’s tough to get a sense of how this compares with other jurisdictions or the state more broadly in the absence of more detailed data. But the numbers suggest that it will be challenging to fast-track vaccinations to specific at-risk groups.

In any case, Mr. Garcia said he believed that the statewide partnerships with insurers could help streamline vaccine distribution even more, in particular the allocation of doses to providers — whether they are public health departments or clinics.

“There needs to be a change,” he said. “I’m very hopeful this new system will fix some of the issues.”

NYTimes, California Report

 

Monday, January 11, 2021

How the Governor Proposes to Respond to the Covid based Economic Crisis

 

Governor’s Proposed Budget Responds to Emergency Needs of the Pandemic, Misses Opportunities for Urgent and Ongoing Investments


Governor Newsom's proposed 2021-22 budget is out, and the California Budget & Policy Center team is providing you our First Look analysis to break down the administration's policy proposals.

Our analysis and take: While the administration’s proposals seek to address the challenges confronting many Californians amid the pandemic, the proposed spending plan misses opportunities to address other urgent and ongoing basic needs of Californians, particularly Californians with low incomes and people of color. 

Ongoing investments in the 2021-22 state budget would help to allay the health and financial strains that millions of children, families, workers, and individuals will face in the months and years to come.
View the Report
Be sure to Tweet or forward our First Look report with your colleagues and follow us for the latest facts and information that can advance public policies to improve the health and economic security of all Californians.
 

Wednesday, December 2, 2020

California lags behind in available hospital beds

 By Thomas Fuller and Manny Fernandez

·       NYT>

SAN FRANCISCO — For all its size and economic might, California has long had few hospital beds relative to its population, a shortfall that state officials now say may prove catastrophic.

California is experiencing its largest surge in coronavirus cases with an average of nearly 15,000 new cases a day, an increase of 50 percent from the previous record over the summer.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/01/us/california-hospital-bed-shortage.html

Monday, December 16, 2019

Resistance- California Fights Back


Fred Glass
December 5, 2019
The Stansbury Forum
At the same moment that Trump was riding his horse Xenophobe through a narrow passageway in the Electoral College to the presidency, California elected only Democrats..., extended progressive tax revenues and ...locked out anti-immigrant policy...

2015: San Francisco, CA.: H&R Block demanding the government give back billions. Unhoused person resting at a bus stop., Copyright 2015: Robert Gumpert

State of Resistance: What California’s Dizzying Descent and Remarkable Resurgence Mean for America’s Future, by Manuel Pastor (New Press, 2018, 278 pages)
California Fights Back:  The Golden State in the Age of Trump, by Peter Schrag (Heyday Press, 2018, 112 pages)
“California is America fast-forward,” says Manuel Pastor in State of Resistance:  What California’s Dizzying Descent and Remarkable Resurgence Means for America’s Future.  I hope he’s right, and the author gives us reason to think so. 
So does former Sacramento Bee editor Peter Schrag in California Fights Back:  The Golden State in the Age of Trump. Schrag foresees an attainable national future in the state’s self-assigned role as lead organizer of the opposition to Trump:  “Given California’s size, demographic diversity, economic heft, and its (mostly) blue political hue, it’s not surprising that the state is both the leader of the resistance […] and, at the same time, a bright model of an alternative.”
Although each book largely presents latter-day California history with accuracy and insight, State of Resistanceprovides a deeper dive into the state’s complex social relationships, while California Fights Backfeatures a thinner but useful empirical recitation of how the state’s political actors have fought the Trump regime’s offense against immigrants, facts and common decency.
( n.b. California fights back is more useful.  But, both are pre Trump)
In both books we learn how, by the late twentieth century, the once lustrous Golden State had lost its sheen.  When Governor Pete Wilson found himself behind in the polls in 1994, after his first term in office, the hitherto moderate Republican came up with an explanation for the state’s economic doldrums:  illegal immigrants.  He fashioned a ballot measure, Proposition 187, to deny undocumented immigrants and their children most state sponsored services, including public education, and sailed to reelection on these mean-spirited winds.  (Prop 187 was soon found unconstitutional.)
A decade later, Arnold Schwarzenegger couldn’t plausibly finger immigrants as the source of his failure to deliver on bombastic campaign promises to “blow up the boxes” of government bureaucracy, since he had arrived on these shores from elsewhere himself—although, with Wilson, Iago-like, whispering in his ear, he briefly tried.  Instead, the wealthy governor made scapegoats of public employees and their unions, and called a special election to deal what he imagined would be deathblows to these mortal enemies of the people.  His ballot measures proposed to dismantle pensions, strip away job protections, and wrest for himself dictatorial control over the state budget.
But the electorate didn’t see things his way.  Instead, teachers, nurses and firefighters, powered by grassroots organizing and a much smarter media strategy than Schwarzenegger’s, molded themselves into a secular Holy Trinity, and their union-funded campaign solidly defeated the once and future movie actor’s nasty ballot measures.  Their cause was helped along by the Governator’s contemptuous demeanor, transparent lies about his opponents, and abrupt policy zigazgs. 
Both authors see this as a turning point, or at least the moment that revealed California’s tectonic shift from celebrity media politics, conservative gutter ideologies and austerity policies a couple decades ago, to the present day when the state stands as a bulwark of ethnic tolerance and serious, if insufficient efforts to address the threats of economic inequality and climate change.  Pastor in particular digs below the surface of electoral politics and personalities to diagnose the structural problems that led to the state’s decline and analyze its path to improvement in ways that might help others.
Thus two-time governor Jerry Brown often received plaudits, especially outside California, for the state’s phoenix-like rise from the Great Recession, during which time right-wing pundits enjoyed calling liberal California a “failed state.”  (They still do, not having noticed, or choosing to ignore, the changed circumstances.)  At the moment he was elected in 2010, public education was losing ten thousand K-12 teaching positions a year; services to seniors and the poor were slashed to the bone; and four of the top ten counties in the country hit hardest by the sub-prime housing crisis were to be found in the Central Valley.