Wednesday, October 30, 2024

Trump Nuts

Trump nuts  

If he wins, it might be even worse as the thugs, militias, MAGA nuts and stupid old men with guns will be celebrating the same way the Nazis celebrated Kristallnacht. Trump will be encouraging “real Americans” to act like the Stasi and will tell them to identify, denounce and turn in suspected “migrants.”

 

Never before have voters been warned so clearly and persistently that a certain candidate would govern like a “fascist” or a “dictator,” as some of Trump’s former aides have in recent days. Never before has that same candidate spent the last weeks of his presidential campaign escalating threats toward his enemies anyway. And it is not usually the case that, in the closing days of a campaign, a candidate finds himself denying accounts that he praised Hitler.

 

Listen to Timothy Snyder apply his book On Tyranny to the election this week.

 

https://snyder.substack.com/p/on-tyranny-right-now-audio





 

Monday, October 28, 2024

Choosing Democracy: American Fascism

Choosing Democracy: American Fascism: by Henry Wallace. Former Vice President of the U.S. 1944. The dangerous American fascist is the man who wants to do in the United States in ...

Thursday, October 24, 2024

What Happens if Trump Wins ? Heather Cox Richardson

 

 

What (Really) Happens if Trump Wins? – Hitler – Then and Now

 

Heather Cox Richardson
October 22, 2024
Letters from an American

 

  •  

Three months after Hitler promised to uphold the German Constitution, the concentration camp Dachau was open. Its first prisoners were not Jews, but rather Hitler’s prominent political opponents. By April, Jews had been purged from the civil service,

 

On Saturday, September 7, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump predicted that his plan to deport 15 to 20 million people currently living in the United States would be “bloody.” He also promised to prosecute his political opponents, including, he wrote, lawyers, political operatives, donors, illegal voters, and election officials. Retired chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley told journalist Bob Woodward that Trump is “a fascist to the core…the most dangerous person to this country.” 

On October 14, Trump told Fox News Channel host Maria Bartiromo that he thought enemies within the United States were more dangerous than foreign adversaries and that he thought the military should stop those “radical left lunatics” on Election Day. Since then, he has been talking a lot about “the enemy from within,” specifically naming Representative Adam Schiff and former House speaker Nancy Pelosi, both Democrats from California, as “bad people.” Schiff was the chair of the House Intelligence Committee that broke the 2019 story of Trump’s attempt to extort Volodymyr Zelensky that led to Trump’s first impeachment. 

Trump’s references to the “enemy from within” have become so frequent that former White House press secretary turned political analyst Jen Psaki has called them his closing argument for the 2024 election, and she warned that his construction of those who oppose him as “enemies” might sweep in virtually anyone he feels is a threat.

In a searing article today, political scientist Rachel Bitecofer of The Cycle explored exactly what that means in a piece titled “What (Really) Happens If Trump Wins?” Bitecofer outlined Adolf Hitler’s January 30, 1933, oath of office, in which he promised Germans he would uphold the constitution, and the three months he took to dismantle that constitution.

By March, she notes,  the concentration camp Dachau was open. Its first prisoners were not Jews, but rather Hitler’s prominent political opponents. By April, Jews had been purged from the civil service, and opposition political parties were illegal. By May, labor unions were banned and students were burning banned books. Within the year, public criticism of Hitler and the Nazis was illegal, and denouncing violators paid well for those who did it.

Bitecofer writes that Trump has promised mass deportations “that he cannot deliver unless he violates both the Constitution and federal law.” To enable that policy, Trump will need to dismantle the merit-based civil service and put into office those loyal to him rather than the Constitution. And then he will purge his political opponents, for once those who would stand against him are purged, Trump can act as he wishes against immigrants, for example, and others.

Ninety years ago, as American reporter Dorothy Thompson ate breakfast at her hotel in Berlin on August 25, 1934, a young man from Hitler’s secret police, the Gestapo, “politely handed me a letter and requested a signed receipt.” She thought nothing of it, she said, “But what a surprise was in store for me!” The letter informed her that, “in light of your numerous anti-German publications,” she was being expelled from Germany.

She was the first American journalist expelled from Nazi Germany, and that expulsion was no small thing. Thompson had moved to London in 1920 to become a foreign correspondent and began to spend time in Berlin. In 1924 she moved to the city to head the Central European Bureau for the New York Evening Post and the Philadelphia Public Ledger. From there, she reported on the rise of Adolf Hitler. She left her Berlin post in 1928 to marry novelist Sinclair Lewis, and the two settled in Vermont.

When the couple traveled to Sweden in 1930 for Lewis to accept the Nobel Prize in Literature, Thompson visited Germany, where she saw the growing strength of the fascists and the apparent inability of the Nazi’s opponents to come together to stand against them. She continued to visit the country in the following years, reporting on the rise of fascism there, and elsewhere. 

In 1931, Thompson interviewed Hitler and declared that, rather than “the future dictator of Germany” she had expected to meet, he was a man of “startling insignificance.” She asked him if he would “abolish the constitution of the German Republic.” He answered: “I will get into power legally” and, once in power, abolish the parliament and the constitution and “found an authority-state, from the lowest cell to the highest instance; everywhere there will be responsibility and authority above, discipline and obedience below.” She did not believe he could succeed: “Imagine a would-be dictator setting out to persuade a sovereign people to vote away their rights,” she wrote in apparent astonishment.

Thompson was back in Berlin in summer 1934 as a representative of the Saturday Evening Post when she received the news that she had 24 hours to leave the country. The other foreign correspondents in Berlin saw her off at the railway station with “great sheaves of American Beauty roses.” 

Safely in Paris, Thompson mused that in her first years in Germany she had gotten to know many of the officials of the German republic, and that when she had left to marry Lewis, they offered “many expressions of friendship and gratitude.” But times had changed. “I thought of them sadly as my train pulled out,” she said, “carrying me away from Berlin. Some of those officials still are in the service of the German Government, some of them are émigrés and some of them are dead.” 

Thompson came home to a nation where many of the same dark impulses were simmering, her fame after her expulsion from Germany following her. She lectured against fascism across the country in 1935, then began a radio program that reached tens of millions of listeners. Hired in 1936 to write a regular column three days a week for the New York Herald Tribune, she became a leading voice in print, too, warning that what was happening in Germany could also happen in America. 

In an echo of Lewis’s bestselling 1935 novel It Can’t Happen Here, she wrote in a 1937 column: “No people ever recognize their dictator in advance…. He always represents himself as the instrument for expressing the Incorporated National Will. When Americans think of dictators they always think of some foreign model. If anyone turned up here in a fur hat, boots and a grim look he would be recognized and shunned…. But when our dictator turns up, you can depend on it that he will be one of the boys, and he will stand for everything traditionally American.” 

In less than two years, the circulation of her column had grown to reach between seven and eight million people. In 1939 a reporter wrote: “She is read, believed and quoted by millions of women who used to get their political opinions from their husbands, who got them from [political commentator] Walter Lippmann.” The reporter likened Thompson to First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, saying they were the two “most influential women in the U.S.”

When 22,000 American Nazis held a rally at New York City’s Madison Square Garden in honor of President George Washington’s birthday on February 20, 1939, Thompson sat in the front row of the press box, where she laughed loudly during the speeches and yelled “Bunk!” at the stage, illustrating that she would not be muzzled by Nazis. After being escorted out, she returned to her seat, where stormtroopers surrounded her. She later told a reporter: “I was amazed to see a duplicate of what I saw seven years ago in Germany. Tonight I listened to words taken out of the mouth of Adolf Hitler.” 

Two years later, In 1941, Thompson returned to the issue she had raised when she mused about those government officials who had gone from thanking her to expelling her. In a piece for Harper’s Magazine titled “Who Goes Nazi?” she wrote: “It is an interesting and somewhat macabre parlor game to play at a large gathering of one’s acquaintances: to speculate who in a showdown would go Nazi,” she wrote. “By now, I think I know. I have gone through the experience many times—in Germany, in Austria, and in France. I have come to know the types: the born Nazis, the Nazis whom democracy itself has created, the certain-to-be fellow-travelers. And I also know those who never, under any conceivable circumstances, would become Nazis.”

Examining a number of types of Americans, she wrote that the line between democracy and fascism was not wealth, or education, or race, or age, or nationality. “Kind, good, happy, gentlemanly, secure people never go Nazi,” she wrote. They were secure enough to be good natured and open to new ideas, and they believed so completely in the promise of American democracy that they would defend it with their lives, even if they seemed too easygoing to join a struggle. “But the frustrated and humiliated intellectual, the rich and scared speculator, the spoiled son, the labor tyrant, the fellow who has achieved success by smelling out the wind of success—they would all go Nazi in a crisis,” she wrote. “Those who haven’t anything in them to tell them what they like and what they don’t—whether it is breeding, or happiness, or wisdom, or a code, however old-fashioned or however modern, go Nazi.”

In Paris following her expulsion from Berlin, Thompson told a reporter for the Associated Press that the reason she had been attacked was the same reason that Hitler’s power was growing. “Chancellor Hitler is no longer a man, he is a religion,” she said.

Suggesting her expulsion was because of her old article disparaging Hitler, in her own article about her expulsion she noted: “My offense was to think that Hitler is just an ordinary man, after all. That is a crime against the reigning cult in Germany, which says Mr. Hitler is a Messiah sent by God to save the German people…. To question this mystic mission is so heinous that, if you are a German, you can be sent to jail. I, fortunately, am an American, so I merely was sent to Paris. Worse things can happen….” 

Notes:


 

  

Tuesday, October 22, 2024

How to Talk About Immigration During This Election

  

 

How to have conversations about Immigration this election season.

 

How to talk about immigration this election season 

As we face anti-immigrant rhetoric from politicians and the media, here are five tips you can use to talk about immigration and build support for welcoming communities. 

OCT 18, 2024

  

6 PRINCIPLES FOR WELCOMING, DIGNIFIED, JUST IMMIGRATION


   Jon Krieg/AFSC

At AFSC, we welcome all people no matter where they were born, or when or how they choose to migrate. We know that immigrants make our communities stronger, and we value the many contributions of immigrant leaders and organizers. 

We also know that as soon as we turn on the news in the U.S. today, we will be bombarded with anti-immigrant messages. And in this election season, the national conversation about immigration has only gotten worse.

Fortunately, the majority of people in the U.S.—74%—actually do want an immigration system that welcomes people and treats them with dignity. And there are effective messages we can use to break through the noise and vitriol of this moment. 

Whether you’re having dinner with family who disagree on politics or responding to a friend on social media, here are five tips to change someone’s mind about immigration in the U.S. These tips are the results of research from AFSC and others, such as the ACLU, Goodwin Simon Strategic Research, and The Opportunity Agenda.

 

1. Always start with shared values. 

Whenever you start a conversation on a touchy subject, lead with something you and your listener both value. That creates space in their minds for open conversation. 

For example, start with a message like “Everyone deserves a chance to build a good life for themselves and their families.” That helps frame a conversation on immigration with people who may never have met anyone from outside the U.S. but who share widely held values like freedom and opportunity. 

2. Focus on our shared humanity and the diverse contributions that we all make to our communities. 

We are all human. We all contribute to our communities. We all love our friends and family. And we all make mistakes. Talking about each other as full, complicated, messy humans—including immigrants—humanizes people and cuts through the demonizing rhetoric we see in the media.

Many times, pro-immigrant conversations focus on the economic contributions that immigrants make to communities. It’s important to go beyond these messages to talk about the kinds of contributions we all make to our communities. We’re not just workers but also neighbors, friends, family members, and more. This kind of messaging helps humanize everyone’s complexities and contributions, including immigrants.

3. Address listeners’ fears indirectly. 

It’s important to acknowledge people’s fears, which can be exacerbated by misinformation in the media. Some of these fears have nothing to do with immigrants.  

But we can also provide accurate information and real stories of immigrants that can help people work through those fears. AFSC is just one of many organizations that welcomes newcomers, supports immigrants as they pursue efforts toward residency and citizenship, and advocates to keep families together. You can indirectly address people’s fears by describing some of these efforts.

4. Model the change you want to see. 

Telling stories about your personal growth or how you have changed your own mind gives your listener permission to be open-minded. It also serves as a roadmap for how to grow, too.

Try sharing a story from your own life about meeting someone from another country and getting to know them as a full person, quirks and all. Show how you interacted with each other in some way. That might include helping each other at work or volunteering together in your community. Talk about how you grew or evolved in your own thinking as a result.


5. If your listener isn’t listening, talk past them to the people who are. 

Even if someone doesn’t agree with you right away, it doesn’t mean you haven’t planted a seed in their mind—or in the minds of other listeners.

To cut through the noise this election season, tell a story that starts with a shared value, focus on our shared humanity, calm someone’s fears, and, ultimately, show how you have grown.
Want to learn more about how to talk about immigration? Watch our webinar on how to have "hard conversations" about immigration from our recent webinar series.


TELL CONGRESS

ACT NOW FOR WELCOMING, DIGNIFIED, AND JUST IMMIGRATION 

 

AFSC White LogoFrom American Friends Service Committee. 

 

How Can This Race be Tied ? Robert Reich.

  

How the hell can the race be tied?

Two weeks before an election in which America should be sending Trump home (and then to jail), he and Harris are in a statistical tie in the battleground states. 

ROBERT REICH

OCT 22

 

https://robertreich.substack.com/p/how-the-hell-can-they-be-tied?




Thursday, October 17, 2024

The Case for Immigration Policy

Although immigration is a source of significant strength for the U.S. economy, the current immigration policy regime squanders too many of its potential benefits by depriving immigrants of their full rights as workers.  For example, immigration overall has led to better wages and work opportunities for U.S.-born workers.  Yet, it's also evident that when workers are denied full and equal labor and employment rights, as some immigrants are when their immigration status is used against them—it makes their lives more precarious and can harm the people with whom they work side-by-side in the same industries. 

 

Sunday, October 13, 2024

Choosing Democracy: Trump as Fascist

Choosing Democracy: Trump as Fascist:   Heather Cox Richardson. Trump as Fascist. https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/october-13-2024 ?   As previously reported.

Thursday, October 10, 2024

Harris has significant lead among college students.


Johanna Alonso
October 9, 2024
Inside Higher Ed
A new Inside Higher Ed/Generation Lab survey shows Harris leading nationally by 38 points, with around a third of students reporting they are more likely to cast a ballot because she’s top of the ticket.

An argument that we should be concerned more about our own demographic, not the students.

 

Turn Out Will Determine in Critical Central Valley Districts

 https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/election/california-elections/article293676049.html?

Saturday, October 5, 2024

Voting in This Election

The California Poor People’s Campaign has produced a voter education page. 

The guide gives a sharp distinction of how candidates have voted and pledge to vote on key issues. 

 

We’ve put together a voting education page to support you as you make preparations to vote. The page offers a variety of resources to prepare for this year’s elections, including:

  • A Voting Record: This voting record graphic will help you see where major candidates and parties stand on the big issues of the day, from raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour to lowering prescription drug prices. It offers detailed information about how they’ve voted on these issues in the past.
  • Voter Protection Resources: These resources include voter protection hotlines and websites for help if you face any issues voting in this year’s elections. Trained experts will ensure you are able to cast a ballot.
  • Everything You Need to Vote: This graphic includes clickable links to essential resources, such as important deadlines for voting in your state, registration checks, absentee ballot requests, ballot previews ahead of time, finding local polling place locators, election reminders, and registration to vote. 

We encourage you to share this page with your friends, family, and social networks. These resources will help guarantee that we can mobilize many poor and low-income infrequent voters during this year’s elections. 


You can also participate by

Ways to participate in elections.

 

Volunteer to be a poll worker

Volunteer to be a poll watcher

Boost voter turn out.   Send cards, text messages, phone bank.   

Defend the right to vote.  Oppose voter interference.  Voter suppression. 

Educate your friends and neighbors, and union members, church members, civil rights organizations, etc.

Local campaign opportunities.

Kamala Harris for President

Jessica Morse for Congress

Activate America

Emily's List

events.dems.org

Indivisible

Mobilize

Sister District

Swing Left

Women Rising

  

Christian Radicals and the Election

 


Stephanie McCrummen
October 1, 2024
The Atlantic

Gerrymandering and Control of the U.S. House

  

Gerrymandering and Control of the U.S. House

 

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/gerrymandering-gives-one-party-head-start-house-race

 

Wednesday, October 2, 2024

Who Are the ‘Undecided’?

Who Are the ‘Undecided’?: It may not be about issues, but whether voters surrender to Trump’s invitation to return to the womb.