Enforcing trade rules is not a ‘trade war’
The recent tariffs on steel and aluminum have been characterized as trade
war. This is weird, because countries often enforce trade rules with targeted
tariffs and sanctions, and markets adjust. What’s the real issue?

In the orthodoxy of free trade, tariffs are heresy. Any tariff suggests
that the neoliberal free trade approach has failed and government intervention
is required. Also, if we protect steel, then the “protectionist barbarians” all
rush in and want import restrictions, too.
This begs the question, “Why have rules for globalization at all, if we
won’t enforce them?”
The context for the recent steel and aluminum tariffs should start with a
central message from the 2016 presidential campaign. Millions of workers and
communities around the country feel left behind by our approach to
globalization. We can do something about that
….. or not.
President Trump speaks in terms of win-lose or “everyone is out to get us.”
But he is doing something. The advice from free-trade establishment experts
seems to be:
● We can’t do anything;